However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 14, 2017, at around 19:00, the Defendant was faced with disturbance, such as sending the entrance door, around 12, 504, from Suwon-si apartment C, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, where the wife B was living, on the ground that: (a) the circumstances leading up to the police box belonging to the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Police Station D, who was called upon receipt of a 112 report to the effect that “the Defendant was sending the entrance door,” prevented the Defendant from committing the Defendant’s act; (b) the Defendant, by hand, pushed the chest part of the Defendant’s chest, was pushed up three times, and was snicked.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reporting management.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (abstinence, reflectment, or old age that has no record of crime as well as a fine for a crime of 700,000 won in 205);