If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C car.

On August 23, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 10:40 on August 23, 2015, and proceeded to the west-gu D intersection from the parallel of Taepyeong-dong to the west-distance.

Although the location can proceed only to the intersection signal with signal lights, the defendant was proceeding to the stop signal in violation of signal instructions.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the signal indicating traffic safety facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E’s legal statement (the witness E’s statement is consistent and concrete from the investigative agency to this court, and is consistent with objective circumstances such as the field signal system of the case, the traffic volume at the time, and the police officer E appears to have no motive to make a false statement, and the witness E’s statement is believed to be trust, and according to the above statement, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant violated the signal as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment).

1. Application of enforcement manual and field map statutes;

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;