However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant attempted to intrude upon his residence: (a) the victim B, who was the victim of his school, was at the end, and did not contact with the victim; (b) sought a restaurant where the victim was on duty as an employee and was accommodated in the room; and (c) was on June 29, 2018, at the “D” restaurant located in Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, a member of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members of the group of members.

2. At night, around 00:30 on July 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) entered the “H” restaurant operated by the victim G from the victim G located in the E building F in Silung-si, Silung-si; (b) intruded into the facility through an unCorrectioned main window; and (c) stolen the facility with 2,500 won in cash, and IMO cards, which are owned by the victim in the safe; and (d) stolen them.

3. At around July 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) taken a thief, which was installed in front of the “K” restaurant located under the jurisdiction of the Sinh City Council on July 2, 2018; (b) taken a 1.8 million won of cash owned by the victim; (c) taken a 1.8 million won of cash owned by the victim; and (d) withdrawn 2.1 million won of cash owned by the victim in the same manner from the cash withdrawal machine managed by the victim L corporation located in front of the said e-mail card on the back of the said e-mail card; and (c) withdrawn 0,000 won of cash owned by the victim in the same manner from the cash withdrawal machine managed by the victim L corporation located in the front of the e-mail city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement related to B and G;

1. A written statement of theO;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 322 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment