A. The sentence of each of the Defendants (Defendant B: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months; imprisonment for six months; imprisonment for two years in prison for six months; community service work for 160 hours; and fine for 8 million won in case of Defendant A) is too unreasonable.

B. Each sentence of the lower court by the Prosecutor is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances that are favorable to the Defendants, such as the fact that the Defendants recognized their mistakes and reflects them, and the crime of this case is likely to disrupt the sound employment order by operating a news report room for a considerable period of time or providing its place, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good. Defendant B committed the same crime without being aware of the repeated crime; Defendant C was punished twice due to the crime of this case; Defendant A committed the crime without being aware of it during the repeated crime; Defendant A committed the crime without being aware of it; and Defendant A committed the crime without being aware of it during the repeated crime; taking into account the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case; the circumstances after the crime; the age, character, and environment of the Defendants; and other various sentencing factors indicated in the records, such as the punishment imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.