손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs, which orders additional payment.
1. Basic facts
A. On December 6, 2012, Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant D”) driven a G Rte test car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with having the Plaintiff aboard on the Chief of Chon-gun, North Korea-U.S., and proceeded along one lane between Daejeon-U.S.-U., and the two lanes at a distance of 165 km away from the upstream of the upstream-U.S.-U., North Korea-U., U.S., and found that the HK5 vehicle (hereinafter “Nonindicted 1”) driven along the two-lanes on the front side of the vehicle, which was driven at the two-lanes on the front side of the vehicle, was driven by the front side of the Defendant vehicle while the snow was cut off, and the latter part of the I bus (hereinafter “Nonindicted 2”) followed by the latter.
B. After the occurrence of the above accident, the driver of the plaintiff A, the defendant D, and the driver of the non-party 2 moved to the rear of the non-party 2 vehicle along the side, and during that process, the J R R R R R R R truck (hereinafter "non-party 3 vehicle") which was driven along the two-lanes of the above road turned to snowway, and shocked the shoulder of the plaintiff A.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident” in total)
Plaintiff
A due to the instant traffic accident, A suffered bodily injury, such as fluoral salt base, right-hand salt base, dluoral seat, cerebral drain, etc.
At the time of the instant traffic accident, Plaintiff A was transferred to receive education on forest fire prevention at the Daejeon Government General Office Building, along with public officials belonging to the viewing and viewing service (K clerk), and Defendant D was a public official belonging to the viewing and viewing service.
E. Plaintiff B’s wife and Plaintiff C are Plaintiff A’s children, and Defendant E shares Defendant A’s father with Defendant D’s father, and Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract regarding Defendant A’s vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 6 and Eul evidence 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and images, and the purport of the whole pleadings.