When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant’s defamation from around May 30, 2018 to the same year.

6. Until August 8, 200, the fact in the Daegu Dong-gu Seoul apartment commercial building 104 was that the victim D had not fulfilled the duty of disclosure of the defective part in the course of mediating the real estate, but the victim injured the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false information by posting a banner stating "E certified broker D has failed to fulfill the duty of disclosure of the defective part of the goods in the sales contract No. 202 Dong-dong 703, and cannot repair the contract after drawing up the contract, and urged the contractor to return 20 million won."

2. As set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the business of a certified broker by having the victim conduct one person demonstration using banners and diskettes containing false facts in front of the certified broker office operated by the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on assembly photographs;

1. Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (including defamation) and Articles 314(1) and 313 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;