2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. From March 5, 2013 to March 5, 2013, Defendant Kimcheon-si

8. By December 21, 200, “C and D Sea Reclamation (hereinafter “C and D Sea Reclamation”) were carried out by Kimcheon-si E, and each land listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each land of this case”) was incorporated into the said Corporation in the process, including G, H or I, in which the nominal owner of each land of this case is G, H or I.

1.A consent to the use of the land to be incorporated (including the paper) for flood restoration works, and to the subsequent use of the land as the site for the facilities (river, road, etc.) in no objection is raised in any case.

2. In addition, I will deliver this content to the purchaser at the time of land transaction so as not to cause a civil petition.

3.This project promises to be paid later under the provisions of Article 68 (Calculation of Compensation Amount) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects with respect to the land (area) and obstacles incorporated into the flood damage restoration project executed by the storm and flood damage of No. 16.

2) Around November 2012, Defendant Kimcheon-si prepared for the instant flood restoration work, held a presentation session for residents to the said construction, and received a written consent for land use by landowners, etc. to be incorporated into the site of the said construction. The Plaintiffs drafted a written consent for land use as follows with respect to each of the instant land in the name of “G clan representative J” and “K of representatives from among the species B”. 3) Defendant Kimcheon-si around May 201 and the same year: < Amended by Act No. 11873, May 20, 2013>

7. At around 17.1, while proceeding with the procedure for compensating for losses for the land incorporated for the flood restoration work of this case, the plaintiffs also filed a request for consultation on compensation for losses, but the compensation for each land of this case was not provided with documents necessary for consultation on compensation for losses.