The judgment below

Upon examining the reasoning in light of the record, the court below is just in rejecting the defendant's assertion on mental and physical disability, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles on mental and physical disability as alleged in the ground of appeal.

In addition, the ground of appeal asserts that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to "Carrying of dangerous articles" in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) shall not be a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant as the ground of appeal that the court below did not consider it as the object of

Furthermore, the lower court did not err in its determination as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.