However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 14, 2014, around 06:20 on September 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that it was in the warehouse of the E office operated by the victim D in Busan metropolitan area; and (b) invaded into the warehouse through a non-Correctioned entrance, and then stolen the victim’s tension pumps and tap water worth KRW 170,000 at the market price owned by the victim.

2. Night building thief;

A. At around 05:00 on September 15, 2014, the Defendant intruded into the warehouse in the same manner at the same place, and stolen the content accessories and taps equivalent to 60,000 won at the market price owned by the victim at that place.

B. Around 04:30 on September 21, 2014, the Defendant intruded into the said warehouse in the same manner at the same place, and stolen the Defendant’s market price at which the victim owned the said storage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 330, 329, and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the points of larceny and the choice of imprisonment), which are applicable to the choice of punishment, shall be applicable;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the first offender and the second offender) in the suspension of execution;