2. It is recognized that the Defendant, who made a judgment, led to the confession of all of the instant crimes and the attitude of reflecting the mistake, and the driving distance was not clear.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant was sentenced one year to a suspended sentence for six months due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and committed the crime in this case during the suspended sentence period, and the defendant's above records, the criminal punishment seems to make it difficult to expect the effect of the prevention of drinking driving to the defendant. In addition, in full view of various circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and result of the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the court below after the judgment below, the court below's sentence is deemed reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there are no other circumstances to deem it unfair to maintain it as it is.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.