용역비
1. The Defendant’s 179,625,600 and the Plaintiff’s 6% per annum from August 9, 2017 to April 12, 2019, and the following.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of design services and supervision services for buildings, and the Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of real estate development and investment business.
B. On July 9, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a design service contract (hereinafter “the first service contract”) with the Defendant to provide the shop design for the Dol canal wells (hereinafter “instant project”) to the Defendant in Ansan-si (hereinafter “instant project”) and to receive KRW 38 million (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply).
C. On September 2016, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with the shop design of the sampling of the instant project and entered into a sampling design service contract for receiving KRW 20 million (hereinafter “the second service contract”). D.
On November 7, 2016, the Defendant modified the construction plan of the instant project, thereby dividing the project site from 39 to 43 parcels.
On November 8, 2016, the Plaintiff proposed that the Defendant pay for the construction design modification service (hereinafter “third-party service”) at KRW 49.5 million. On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff prepared and sent a third-party service contract to the Defendant.
E. On February 3, 2017, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with the shop design drawings reflecting a design change, and on March 7, 2017, the design drawings for sampling construction were also provided.
F. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant modified the construction plan of the instant project on April 8, 2017 and changed the project site from 43 to 27 parcels.
Accordingly, on April 10, 2017, the Plaintiff proposed that the Defendant be paid KRW 600,000 out of the price for the design service that was already in progress, and that a new service contract is concluded according to the revised construction plan, but the Defendant did not accept the said proposal.
G. Meanwhile, in relation to the instant business, the Plaintiff received a total of KRW 73 million from the Defendant ( KRW 28 million on August 30, 2016, and KRW 45 million on September 13, 2016).