When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 26, 2014, around 22:25, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “C” in front of the “C” in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si B; (b) the police officer D and E wished to arrest the F in the act of committing an offense of obstruction of the performance of official duties; and (c) carried the said E, etc. with his hand, and continuously pushed the said E, carried the chest with his hand; and (d) assaulted the said D’s chest with his hand to stop drinking; and (c) interfered with the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the defendant and F;

1. Each police officer's statement of D, E, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs submitted by victimsH after photographing the damage situations, such as investigation reports, photographs, etc. on the scene of damage, copies of logs working in the I district and police certificates, and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol; (b) the Defendant has no criminal record of punishment; and (c) the Defendant has committed an act of not repeating the crime while against his/her mistake; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to be determined as indicated in