When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2014 High 1909] The defendant has no special occupation at present and the victim B (the victim 40 years of age, remaining) is a soup worker.

1. On April 10, 2014, at around 06:00, the Defendant: (a) found drinking on the 3rd floor soup of Osan City D; (b) sought a soup of 3rd floor; and (c) sought a large amount of frying women’s fry and fry; and (d) the victim refused to enter the soup of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant did so by making soup to the victim of the soup uniform that he was on the Kabreter, and by making soup to the soup to the soup to the soup.

Accordingly, for about 35 minutes, the Defendant interfered with legitimate duties on the use of bathing facilities of the victim by force.

2. Around April 10, 2014, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “nick, finite, how finite, and finite,” to the victim at a place where the victim had a finite customer, by making a report to the police due to a defect in the report, and making the victim feel “nick, finite, and finite.”

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

[2014 Highly 2579] The Defendant is a person who, from April 1, 2014, operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment with the trade name of “F” from the fourth floor of the building E located in Osan-si.

On May 1, 2014, at around 19:00, the Defendant, at the above “F, equipped with three rooms with shower rooms, five rooms, etc., attached to the shower room, employed a female sex trafficking G on the condition that 70,000 won per male son will be provided, and had the police officer, who found the place, receive KRW 1.20,00 won per male son, and let G engage in sexual traffic, but the Defendant did not have attempted to do so on the wind indicating that H is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

In light of B’s statement, the suspect’s image, and the investigation report, etc. to the effect that at the time of making soup, the Defendant was able to take the time when the victim was “satisfe and chrone” at the time of making soup, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s duties and insulting the victim, such as the written judgment by the Defendant.