However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In order to obtain a loan, the Defendant issued a cash card, which is a means of access, to the name in order to obtain the loan, and received an investigation into the case using the cash card for the crime of Bophishing fraud, and received the suspension of indictment from the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office on August 16, 2012, and subsequently issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Gwangju District Court on July 29, 2014 due to the same crime, he/she knew that the relevant account would be used for the crime of Bophishing fraud if he/she sent his/her account number, password, etc. to a third party. However, on May 2019, the Defendant received a loan from the non-member of the name of the organization that caused the fraud of Bophishing fraud, and then he/she received the loan by accumulating the transaction record by accumulating the deposit number and the password of the above bank and the exchange account, and then withdrawn the deposit account by using the account number.

On May 2019, the Defendant opened a bank account under the name of the Defendant (C) and a virtual currency exchange account (D) connected to the said account, and then informed the Defendant of the Defendant’s B bank account, ID, and password to the virtual currency exchange account under the name of the Defendant.

Since then, on May 13, 2019, the name-disscamist who is the cause of the Boscam fraud organization is engaged in as if he is an employee of the E bank at the French site. In order to establish the Mapo Scam passbook to the victim F, the existing loan should be settled in full, and if it is sent from the G bank to the account designated by receiving the loan from the G bank, the existing loan shall be paid.