1. On November 28, 2014, the Defendant fire general goods: (a) around 02:30 on the part of Jinju-si, the victim D’s toilet screen in the toilet room operated by Jinju-si; (b) the victim heard from the victim the horses that smoking in a toilet would not smoke in a toilet; and (c) during the dispute at the time, the Defendant: (a) caused public danger by setting fire to a stop tank by inserting the fluor in a way of inserting the fluoring a cigarette into a stop tank in which the fluor was temporarily suspended.

2. From November 28, 2014, from around 02:30 on November 28, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s game room operation by force by avoiding disturbances for about one hour and 30 minutes, such as smoking tobacco in the above game room, setting fire by setting fire to a toilet stop tank, and receiving a request from the police officer who called upon receipt of the report to move out the game room, and by taking it on the floor of the game room, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s game room operation by force.

3. Around 14:40 on December 1, 2014, the Defendant damaged public documents, at the president of the F Hospital room located in Sacheon-si, was examined as the Defendant’s identity as a suspect by G in the circumstances where the Jinju Police Station affiliated with the Jinju Police Station, and was examined as to the Defendant’s suspected suspicions Nos. 1 and 2 of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the said police officer, and confirmed the content by reading the content of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the said police officer, and, as his hand, requested the police officer to affix seals and seals to the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the said police officer,

4. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods, at the I District Parking Site in the Jinju Police Station located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, on the ground that the police officer does not properly meet his/her demand in connection with the handling of the instant case. However, the Defendant damaged the above patrol car used by public offices by destroying the police patrol car parked at that place to make the repair cost amounting to KRW 110,000,000, in good hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;