2. Although the Defendant appears to have led to the confession and reflect of all of the crimes of this case, the Defendant has already been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the fact that the method of crime is inadequate and the damage recovery has not been made until the court of the trial, and other circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, are considered, and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, are considered, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, the summary of the evidence No. 2 of the original judgment is added to the "written statement prepared by N" between the third and fourth reduction, and this part of the original judgment is corrected]