beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.20 2016가단5073135

보험금

Text

1. The Defendant: 42,857,142 won; 28,571,428 won; and 25,571,428 won to Plaintiff A and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B and C.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A’s wife, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C are children between the Deceased and the Plaintiff.

B. The Deceased and the Defendant entered into a comprehensive F insurance contract with the term of insurance from November 19, 2012 to November 19, 2073.

According to the above insurance contract’s special terms and conditions that guarantee the death of an injury, “if the insured dies as a direct result of the injury, the insurance money shall be paid to the beneficiary as the insurance money.” In this special agreement, the injury refers to the bodily injury suffered due to a sudden and remote accident that occurred during the insurance period.”

The amount of subscription to the Special Terms and Conditions for the Death of the Deceased is 100 million won.

C. On October 21, 2015, the Deceased was used as a cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and arrived at the emergency room of the G Hospital. As a result of the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and external motors, the Deceased recovered the voluntary heart heart stuff (total cardiopulmonary resuscitation implementation time is about 5 minutes). After that, medical personnel performed low temperature treatment and continuous blood therapy against the Deceased.

From October 24, 2015, the deceased's blood pressure was left away from the new wall, and as a result, the deceased was found at around 04:20 on the same day, and a chest was carried out on the right chest of the deceased, but a mass transfusion was followed, and the deceased died from 11:50 on the same day.

The term “the cause of death” in the death certificate against the deceased is indicated as “the cause of death of the deceased” as a direct death, as the cause thereof, as the “blood shock”, as the cause thereof, as the “blood chest”, as the cause thereof, as the “satisfy for the success of the human resuscitation”, as the cause thereof, and as the cause thereof, as

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, 8, 9, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The above-mentioned facts of recognition and evidence No. 4, the results of the examination of medical records, and Seoul National University Hospital.