From October 13, 2011 to September 22, 2015, the Defendant opened an Internet site I and sold molecular sap at the Defendant’s “H” office. The fact is that the said product is merely a general food, not functional health foods, and “after purchase” as the title “after purchase” (i.e., “Second pregnant women”) called “after childbirth,” and, at the time of shock, the Defendant, upon recommendation of her her friend, her friend and her friend with her h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s m.

As a result, the Defendant made an indication or advertisement on products with experience devices that are likely to cause mistake or confusion as having efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or as falling under functional health foods.

2. With respect to the names, manufacturing methods, quality and nutrition labelling of foods, etc., genetically modified foods, etc., and food traceability labelling, no one shall use any of the following false, exaggerated, or exaggerated labelling or advertising, and shall use no exaggerated packaging for packages:

The same shall also apply to the nutritional value, raw materials, ingredients and uses of foods or food additives.

1.