Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

1. On July 25, 2019, at around 12:42 on July 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) walked a trial expense to the instant “B” restaurant; (b) opened the instant “B” restaurant; and (c) opened the back of the victim C (5 years of age) who was frighting for eating at the fish (25cm in length) that was a dangerous thing that was located therein; and (d) asked whether the victim D (62 years of age) is the Defendant; and (b) made the victim D (62 years of age) frighting the victim’s face; (c) frighting the instant salted fish so as to display it to the right road.

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence to victims by carrying dangerous articles.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as that of the preceding paragraph, she gets off the restaurant by using violence as described in the preceding paragraph from customers at the same time and place as that of the assault, and she gets out of the restaurant and juscors. At around 12:45 of the same day, the Defendant she saw out the front frame of the F, located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul, with the face of the victim G (69 years old) who was drinking, she gets out of the body of the victim G (69 years old) who was drinking by drinking, and she she takes out the body of the victim G that she gets out of the launching and her hand, and the victim Ha (6 years old) she she was f6 years old.

As a result, the defendant added a scarcity to the victim G, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and assaulted the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of C, D, G, and H;

1. Records of seizure and list of seizure, records of waiver of ownership, and photographs of supled fish;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

According to the records, the defendant's drinking prior to the crime of this case is recognized, but the details, process, means and method of the crime acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, and before and after the crime.