However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BF small-scale car.

On August 14, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:40, and led to the intersection of the private street without the front signal, etc. at the entrance of the traditional market in the road No. 2 of the Pacific-Eup, Pacific-gun, Pacific-gun, Pacific-gun, from the sloping River to the traditional market in the sloping River.

At the time, since it was at night and there was an intersection where traffic control is not carried out, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed to the driver of the motor vehicle, to take the right and the left, and to accurately operate the steering direction and the brakes, and to enter the road with a wide width, if there are other motor vehicles seeking to enter the intersection, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to yield the course to the vehicle and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected to enter the intersection as it was, the Defendant found that the victim C (n, 53 years old) who entered the road where the width is wider than that of the road that the Defendant passed at the intersection was late behind the victim C (n, 53 years old) and operated the D M& car rapidly, but the Defendant failed to avoid it, thereby receiving the front portion of the driver's seat of the M& car driven by the said victim C as the front part of the operation seat of the above small or other car operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted an injury on the said victim C with salt and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered an injury to the victim E (the 19 years old) who is a passenger of the said victim C’s horse driving. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the said marina car to the extent that 1,323,482 won are damaged, including the exchange of Lart pans, and then stopping the said marina car to the extent that 1,323,482 won are damaged and the victim was able to rescue the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each written diagnosis;