손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by considering the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 and 2:
A. On August 20, 2012, Syman River Business Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Syman River Business”) opened a letter of credit to pay the price for imported goods to the Plaintiff in order to pay the import of the instant steel products from XIAMNND D MTD D MET COCO CO, LTD (hereinafter “C&D D&D M&D”) to the Plaintiff on steel (HOT TRL ALE AL AL ALE DoE DoEM ES DoEM DoEM CEPPPEC (hereinafter “S”). < Amended by Act No. 13504, Aug. 2012, 2012; Act No. 100M x 8M Do19M x 800M x 800 MM, hereinafter “instant steel products”).
B. On August 20, 2012, the Plaintiff opened a beneficiary S&D M&D M&D, US$ 496,800 (/-5 per cent permission), the instant iron bars (/-5 per cent permission), the cost-bearing CFR, etc. (number: MD104208NS9001, hereinafter “the instant L/C”).
C. On September 5, 2012, a consignor of the instant steel industry, issued a bill of lading (B/L; hereinafter referred to as the “instant bill of lading”) in the form of Incheon Port, the shipper of the instant steel industry, the shipper of the instant steel industry, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, and the consignee of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, and the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, and the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, the shipper of the vessel, and the port of discharge of the vessel (hereinafter referred to as the “instant bill of lading”).
On September 6, 2012, the Defendant was requested by the Seoung Steel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoung Steel”) to vicariously perform the loading and unloading of the instant steel bars and keep the instant steel bars.
The Defendant entered the Incheon port on September 7, 2012, the instant steel bars transported by Plash. The Defendant’s instant steel bars and west Steel.