In light of the fact that the patients who received the Rayer lacing lacing lacing lacing lacing, which was at issue in this case in the public prosecutor's case, were not required to be hospitalized, and that the determination of hospitalization is made depending on whether the patients are able to receive the lacing medical insurance fund in advance instead of determining whether or not to be hospitalized by the patients according to the medical judgment, etc., the defendants' deception is recognized, and the court below acquitted the victims of this part of the facts charged, even though the victims delivered

The punishment sentenced by the court below of unfair sentencing (the fine of three million won per fine) is too uneased and unfair.

The punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

In a case where continuous observation by a medical personnel is required with respect to side effects or incidental effects of drugs, which are very low in resistance to or are administered by a patient's disease, the management of the patient's outpatients and food and plant needs to be continuously conducted, and thus, the patient's pains are in a situation where the patient's condition is unable to cope with the patient's condition or where the patient's risk of infection exists, etc., and the patient is receiving medical treatment while staying in the hospital. Thus, the patient's stay in the hospital for at least six hours under the observation and management of the medical personnel in accordance with all the provisions of the "detaileds on the criteria and methods for the application of medical care benefits" as publicly notified by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. However, the determination of hospitalization is not possible based on the patient's symptoms, diagnosis and treatment, the patient's treatment process, and the patient's actions.