경범죄처벌법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
Around 01:40 on March 15, 2019, the Defendant, at the Sado Police Station C District, located in B of the Sado Police Station on March 15, 2019, expressed an objection against the Defendant’s demand that the police officers belonging to the above Sado Police Station, who received the Defendant’s 112 report related to the drinking value and called “the request for a return of the drinking value” by the police officers, who called “the request for a return of the drinking value,” and expressed an objection to the Defendant’s failure to comply with the Defendant’s request.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness D;
1. Notification to a department related to reporting 112 cases;
1. Attachment. The Defendant alleged that he had not taken the drinking while drinking at the time of the instant case. However, according to the witness D’s testimony and the notification of the department related to the report of the 112 Incident, the Defendant was found at the police station immediately after he was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was found to have been under the influence of alcohol at the police station immediately after he was punished, and the time when 112 declaration was made under the influence of alcohol, the time when 01:14 was made under the influence of alcohol, and the time of visiting the police station at 01:40. Considering that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol even if considering the fact that he was under the influence of alcohol and the time of visiting the police station was not under the influence of alcohol, it can be recognized that the Defendant was still under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case.
In addition, the defendant asserts that it is nothing more than a protest against the police's unfair conduct of duty, not a spirits at the time. However, according to the testimony and video materials of the above witness, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant's failure to return home to the police officer beyond a temporarily high level of speech and behavior during the process of indicating the defendant's complaint, and it was difficult to avoid disturbance at the police station for a long time.