2. Determination is that the Defendant lends a bank account, cash card, etc. which can be used for another crime on condition that the Defendant receives KRW 2 million per month to a person who does not have a single face-to-face type. The nature of the offense is not good. The lending of the means of electronic financial transactions act as a factor that abuses another crime and makes it difficult to investigate crimes; the court below rendered a decision by reasonably reducing the amount claimed by a summary order (2 million won) and did not find any circumstances that change the amount is different in the trial; the Defendant was punished five times by a fine; the Defendant’s previous conviction was punished by a fine; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.