beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.17 2016나5797

양수금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Compact 144. 6 May 6, 2003, May 6, 2003, 200, May 6, 2006, 505, 555, 367 CIT Credit Card Co., Ltd. on February 17, 2001, 1,262, 303, 943, 303, 83, 943, 97. 8. 6. 7. 8, 207, Samsung 196, 207, 207, 30, 207, 196. 8, 207, 196, 196, 207, 207, 207, 36. 196, 205, 206, 307, 207, 205, 207, 3194, 207. 25. 31, 206. 2

A. The defendant received a credit card or received a loan or suffered a claim for indemnity due to the payment of insurance money from each financial institution listed below on the date of the agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the loan contract of this case 1 through 8") as of August 31, 2006, and as of August 31, 2006, the defendant did not pay the principal stated in the remaining principal column of the same Table for the loan contract of this case 1 through 8, and the overdue interest accrued at that time is the same as the amount stated in the overdue interest column of the same Table.

(hereinafter “instant loans 1 through 8”). B.

Then, Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. is about April 30, 2003; Samsung Capital Co., Ltd. on June 30, 2003; LG card Co., Ltd. on September 30, 2003; and LG card Co., Ltd. on September 30, 2003, pursuant to Article 4 of the Act on the Efficient Disposal of Non-Performing Assets, etc. of Financial Institutions and the Establishment of Korea Asset Management Corporation.