beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.07.30 2015고단359

특수절도등

Text

Defendant

B and A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the defendant C is subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 359"

1. Defendant B and the Defendants, around 01:30 on August 17, 2014, stolen total of KRW 1,084,00 on 14 occasions from around that time to February 2, 2015, and stolen property over four occasions, and attempted to commit an attempted crime, including that: (a) the victim AZ operated by Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul; (b) the victim AZ opened the said house through the rear door of the locker without locking; and (c) the cash owned by the victim, which was located in the west; and (d) the victim, from that time to February 05:00, 2015.

As a result, the Defendants committed a theft of the victims' property 14 times together, and attempted to steals their property 4 times.

2. Defendant A: (a) around August 23, 2014, at a time operated by the victim AY in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 01:48, Defendant A opened an unrecied back door and intruded into it, and had 50,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession under custody.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by the victim at night, and stolen the victim's property.

Defendant B, and A around 01:20 on February 4, 2015, around 01:20, at the “BC” restaurant operated by the victim BB located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant A reported the window corrected by using the dracker, outside the restaurant, and Defendant B moved 40,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession, into the restaurant through the window.

As a result, Defendant B and A stolen the victim's property jointly.

"2015 Highest 1246"

1. The Defendants and G’ co-offenders

A. From July 24, 2014, around 03:40 on July 24, 2014, the Defendants were “BF restaurant” in the victim BE operation in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant A and Defendant C reported the network outside G with G, and Defendant B removed the window on the side of the restaurant.