If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

around 16:00 on February 6, 2013, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant would raise the appraisal price of at least 20 billion won over the V commercial building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government” to the victim U at the T underground coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, the defendant was not a private road, but has no intention or ability to enhance appraisal.

On February 6, 2013 and February 8, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 10 million in total as an appraisal agency expense from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against U;

1. U’s accusation (including attached documents);

1. Each investigation report (W telephone conversations with a witness and telephone conversation with U.S.)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on financial transactions;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;