beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.02.08 2016고단731

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 14, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 for a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) to a person who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Daejeon District Court's red support on May 14, 200, and issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on September 1, 2015 by the same court on September 1, 2015, and on January 21, 2016 by the same court on January 21, 2016.

On January 22, 2016, 12:15, the Defendant driven a C-Wurged-Wurged-Wurg-Wurg-Wurg-Wurg-ro 14, the Cheongnam-do Office, from the 167-Wurg-ro, to the 167-Wurg-ro, without obtaining a driver's license from the 424m section, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.27% during blood.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with a hurburged from C, with a view to violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or from an accident) and the Road Traffic Act (or from an accident).

On January 22, 2016, the Defendant came to run from the Cheongdo Office on the front side of the Cheongdo National University, the 14-ro, the Cheongdo National University, the Cheongdo National University, the Dog-ro, the 12:15, and the Cheongdo National University, the Cheongdo National University.

At the same time, the victim D driving E-car was a stop. In such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and to prevent the accident by driving safely by checking well the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in the above Paragraph 1, was found to have been negligent in neglecting his duty at the front time while neglecting the duty of care at the front time, and the part of the victim D’s front driver in front of the passenger car was committed by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.