beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.08 2019고단1198

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant is a director working in Jeju-si, who is in charge of the sales of fertilizers and is engaged in CD24A driving.

around 11:30 on December 16, 2018, the Defendant driven the above 10 knives in Jeju Island, which the victim E (38 years old) purchased on the 10 knives of fertilizers purchased on the 10 knives of the knives on the knives of the above 45 knives of the knives.

In such a case, the defendant, who is engaged in the driving of the foreop vehicle, has a duty of care to operate the machinery well so that he can not drive the vehicle with a large amount of weight to the extent that he can do so, and when he moves the weight, he has a duty of care to operate the machinery well so that the spreading of the fertilizer can not be cut down at once so that it can prevent the accident from being broken down.

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven the above 45 plos of fertilizer loaded with heavy weight of 45 plos of fertilizer to the extent that they can move to the 10 plos of the above fertilizers. The Defendant adjusted the ploser attached to the 10 ploss of the above fertilizers in order to move the 10 ploss purchased by the victim to the 10 plos of the above fertilizers, and caused the 45 ploss of fertilizer loaded on the 45 plos of the above ploss of fertilizer loaded on the plos of the above truck to the victim who was on the plos

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand slive slives of the lower-hand slives, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act: The judgment dismissing prosecution under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: According to the records of this case under Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on August 5, 2019, which was following the institution of the prosecution of this case.