2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant is a so-called “phishing,” and there are unfavorable factors for sentencing, such as that the method of crime is organized, planned, intelligent, and intelligent, and that has a serious adverse effect on society as a whole by massing many unspecified victims, and that the nature of the crime is very poor, and that the Defendant is acting as a cash withdrawal method in the crime of Bophishing.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime; (b) the primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the environment, the details and details of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (b) it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.