When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 26, 2014, around 08:50 on June 26, 2014, the Defendant driven the B car volume, and was in the direction of the maximum hospital at the front of the front line box, which was 1072-2 distance from the front line box at Ansan-si.

Since there is a range of signals installed, all drivers have the duty of care to drive safely according to their signals.

However, the defendant is proceeding with a stop signal, and the part of the victim C's driving D's front part of the driver's D's vehicle, which was directly linked to the normal signal from the left side of the course, was shocked toward the left side of the defendant's vehicle.

In the end, the Defendant caused the injury of salvinal salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E, who is the Dong of the victim C and the damaged vehicle, through the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;