On October 23, 2007, while the Defendant leased C Apartment 536 dong 504 from the victim B and resided there, the Defendant, at the time of the expiration of the lease contract extended on November 17, 201, disputed with the victim as a matter of increase of deposit money and eviction, etc., on June 22, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court rendered a judgment to deliver the said apartment to the victim at the same time on August 9, 2012.

On August 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around August 2012, the Defendant: (b) returned the deposit from the victim in accordance with the above civil judgment; (c) shouldered part of the glass of the inner windows installed in the above apartment; and (d) destroyed the defects by affixing two door-to-door joints of the living room windows; (c) removed the front electronic key, the bathing room receipt room, the shower, the shower hacker, and the two stringer arbitrarily removed the front e-mail, the front e-mail, the reception room, the shower’s repair cost and replacement cost amounting to one million won in total; and (d) damaged the effectiveness of the front gate, the front e-mail, the living room glass, the room glass, the door-to-door electronic key, the bathing room receipt room, the shower, the shower.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (one day: 50,000 won) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., the fact that there is no criminal record against the defendant, and the defendant compensates the victim for damage according to the decision of recommending reconciliation made in related civil