beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.24 2020나29322 (1)

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the payment order against the Defendant exceeds the following amount:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of each traffic accident listed in the following table (hereinafter “the instant accident”), the Plaintiffs are the owners of vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) at the time of each traffic accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and the Defendant is the owner of each Maritime Vehicle that caused the instant accident, and the Defendant is the insurer of the following 1 A G G B B B B H i30 on November 16, 2018, around 19:3:00 on August 28, 2019, in violation of the following 3: 19: the following 3rd CI6 A60 on May 5, 2018, 2018, the details of the first traffic accident on the date of the Plaintiff’s initial registration of the instant Maritime Vehicle, which was concluded with respect to each Maritime Vehicle that caused the instant accident. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24234, Nov. 16, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 24200, Mar. 16, 2019>

B. The Defendant paid insurance proceeds of KRW 1,317,560 to Plaintiff B and KRW 1,628,440 to Plaintiff D under the pretext of compensating for the decline in the exchange value of the Plaintiffs’ vehicle due to the instant accident.

C. At the time of the instant accident, the new car price of the Plaintiffs, the current vehicle price, the repair cost, the repair cost, and the previous accident history are as listed below.

Of the new prices, fixed repair costs and details of existing accidents 132,540,00 won 17,90,000,000 won, 9,490,539 won, flaters exchange, flocks exchange, flocks exchange, flocks exchange, flocks exchange, flock panel exchange, flater panel exchange, flater panel exchange, flater panel exchange, flater panel exchange, flater panel exchange, 0, 00, 00, 00, 00,000, 15,000, 15,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) on August 20, 2016.