However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on September 16, 2008. A

Around April 20, 2013, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B from No. 101 to No. 11, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si.

B. Around May 2, 2013, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B and once at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a).

C. At around 11:00 on May 19, 2013, the Defendant sent to the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) one time with sexual intercourse with B. D.

Around June 2, 2013, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B and once at the place described in the above paragraph (a).

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the date, time, time, and place of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) as mentioned above, had sexual intercourses with A three times with each other.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Complaint;

1. Marriage relation certificate and reception certificate;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Relevant Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act [Defendant A] the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act [Defendant B] each of the latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes [Defendants] each of the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution [Defendants] Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;