2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendants are residents of the D Apartment-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, and two are married families.

1. On March 22, 2014, Defendant A damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “Notwithstanding the fact that the president of the senior citizen’s council did not call to the F apartment management office and did not call to the F apartment management office, the victim E would not know about the compensation.”

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, told the victim E to the F Apartment Management Office that he would not get compensation by posting a telephone, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. Statements made by witnesses E, G and H in the second trial records;

1. Application of each police protocol to I and H

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.