A. In full view of the facts in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff's attached document No. 3, 4, 5, 2000,000,000 won for lease deposit, monthly rent of KRW 400,000,000,000,000 from September 3, 2011 to September 2, 201. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments, Eul, the plaintiff's attached document No. 3,000,000,000 won for the land of the building listed in the attached list No. 3,4,5, 200,000,000,000 won for lease deposit, monthly rent of KRW 4,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the land of the building listed in the attached list No. 3,000,000,000,0000 won for the following reasons.

B. According to the above facts, the contract of this case was lawfully terminated at the time when the plaintiff's expression of intention of termination on the ground of more than twice of pregnancy reaches the defendants. The defendants (the defendant D's direct possessor, the defendant Eul's indirect possessor) are obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff.

In regard to this, Defendant D agreed to the effect that the Plaintiff’s support to the above Defendant was converted to the pre-paid rental housing, and that the Plaintiff immediately filed the instant lawsuit against the above Defendant, but there is evidence to acknowledge the above agreement.