If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a halog car.

On January 30, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 03:25, and led the F convenience store distance in Yansan-gu E at the Jeonju-si to the Do office of the message.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front and rear left and left, and the steering gear of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not perform the above duty of care and did not discover the H rocketing car of the victim G (Y, 24 years old) driving on the right side from the defendant's left side, and went away from the above site without immediately stopping the above stalth part of the victim G and the victim I (W, 49 years old, 24 years old, 24 years old) who is the front part of the above rocketing car due to the shock of the above stalth halog, and the victim I (W, 49 years old, 49 years old, 24 years old) who is the stalthe of the above stalth stalth and the above stalth stalth tension car. Even if the above stalth stalth cab car was damaged to the repair cost of 1,38,346 won and did not immediately stop the stalth stalth stal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Reports on internal investigation (specific relation to the suspect);

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Making teas;

1. Application of Chapter Three Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after the accident)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. An agreement is reached between the victims of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the vehicle will be the vehicle.