If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on December 13, 2013, and is currently under probation after the said judgment was finalized on December 21, 2013.

1. Damage to public goods;

A. On January 26, 2015, at around 04:15, the Defendant: (a) 161 at the center of Daejeon Central District, Daejeon District Police Station C commander of the Daejeon District Police Station: D et al., who was dispatched after receiving a report at KRW 112, listen to the statement of the reporter E; (b) was on board the back seat of the F or another vehicle, which is the patrolr of the said police box; and (c) took the protective partitions installed inside the vehicle, “I do not refuse to take any sprink; (b) I do not want to take any sprink; and (c) was able to take the protective partitions installed inside the vehicle in good hand, such as replacement of the protective partitions inside the vehicle, which is a public object, and thereby, was destroyed to have the effect of the repair cost equivalent to KRW 462,500.

B. At around 05:00 on the same day, the Defendant appealeds that he was arrested as a flagrant offender for the foregoing reasons in front of the suspender of the Daejeon Middle Police Station, which was located in the middle-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, and caused damage to the effect that the repair cost amounting to KRW 495,00,000, including the exchange of automatic entrance and exiters.

2. The Defendant was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an offense at the Daejeon District Police Station C police box, etc., with the content of the above 1’s provisional record, and was transferred to the Daejeon District Police Station C police box located in Daejeon Metropolitan City G around 04:25 on the same day.

The Defendant refused to get off the patrol car from the above D to get off the patrol car, and assaulted the right chest part of D on the left part of D and one part on the left part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of reference to criminal records and investigation reports (report attached to judgments)