beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.11 2014가단5252989

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a party-based corporation C on April 29, 2011 (hereinafter “C”).

(C) the factory in Gu/Si/Gun D (hereinafter referred to as the “factory of this case”).

2) Around May 24, 2011, the Defendant Company A (hereinafter the Defendant Company) entered into a fire insurance contract (hereinafter the instant contract) with C (hereinafter the instant contract).

According to the contract, the defendant company's 22 million won in price C is providing "the construction of the PIL OT valve equipment and the installation of a smoking tower" (hereinafter referred to as the "construction of this case").

Defendant B was in charge of the instant construction as the employee of the Defendant Company.

B. 1) The instant plant was composed of 7 units of the office building and factory, such as the attached placement drawing. The instant construction work that the Defendant Company received and supplied was related to the secondary factory. The Defendant Company completed the construction work to prevent pollution against the secondary factory and to install a duct. C paid the construction cost in full to the Defendant Company. 2) Meanwhile, the Defendant Company E’s regular director, at the Defendant Company’s request, set up a review window to confirm how much dust, etc. is stored in the original type of distribution system (materials: mix, diameter: 450m, thickness: 0.5m) installed on the opportunity of the secondary factory construction at the Defendant Company’s request.

3) Defendant B, as the direction of the regular business of E, went to a 7 factory around June 16, 201, around 11:45. The 7 factory was at the time of the Domination of automobile-proof rubber equipment. The 7 factory distribution agency was a vaporing box of the co-rating agents with strong volatiles used in the Domination work. Defendant B was engaged in the Domination of the 7 factory distribution agency in order to create the inspection hold. During that process, the Domination was fireed within the Domination. The 7 factory distribution agency was destroyed by the Domination of the Domination, renunciation of the Domination, and the Domination of the Domination.