However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 25, 2018, the Defendant driven the said K5 vehicle with the front part of the said K5 vehicle and parked with the front part of the said vehicle, and went to the front part of the DJ Haking-dong Residents' Center in the Eth of the DG Haking-dong. The Defendant neglected his duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, such as accurately operating the steering gear and complying with the signal, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, and thereby neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle. In short, the Defendant was to have the front part of the said K5 vehicle driven by the victim F (23 years of age) with the front part of the said Haak-dong, which was parked with the right part of the said vehicle in the front part of the DV Hagu-dong, the Defendant was to have the victim left part of the Haking-dong-dong Hast-dong Hast-dong Hast-dong Hast-dong Hast-dong Hast, and was to repair the said vehicle to the extent of 20.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the police to F and J;

1. Each photograph (Evidence Nos. 5, 15, 16);

1. A copy of each written estimate;

1. A copy of a medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's error in sentencing is recognized by Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act, and the victim's fault against the defendant.