Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is the owner of the division of B commercial building C in his/her own Government.

A person who has been provided with personal information from a personal information processing person shall not use such personal information for any purpose other than the intended one or provide it to a third party.

Nevertheless, around January 22, 2020, the Defendant requested a manager D who acquired and managed personal information, such as the name, address, and contact number of the divided owners for the management of the commercial building, to provide contact number of the divided owners for the purpose of using the "new personnel management for the divided owners of the commercial building" on the same day, and provided a camera with the number of personal information owned and contact number of the divided owners of the commercial building on the same day. On February 1, 2020, the Defendant, using the above personal information, opened a Kakao Stockholm group TV room for the purpose other than the purpose of providing personal information by transmitting the message to explain the necessity of the organization of the management body of the commercial building, and the message requiring the signature of the written resolution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Complaints of the police statement protocol against E, and requests for cooperation;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of the content of conversation between the Kakao Organization Stockholm.

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant received personal information for the purpose of a new year’s personnel management, and actually sent a new year’s personal information to some of the sectional owners by text messages, and that the complainant sent a new year’s text message on the organization of the management body, and that the personal information was not used for any purpose other than its original purpose.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, E, the investigative agency stated that the principal and the other 4-5 shop owners did not receive a new person from the Defendant, and that the Defendant sent them after establishing a Kakao Stockholm Stockholm.