beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.09.29 2017고단2586

사기

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court on August 9, 2017, and the above judgment was finalized on August 17, 2017. Defendant B was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Busan District Court on July 14, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 18, 2016.

[2] The Defendants committed the crime in collusion with the non-personal telephone financial fraud assistance staff (hereinafter “help staff”) such as the name “D” in sequence, and committed the crime by misrepresenting the inspection according to the general responsibility’s instructions, and the account opened in the name of the victims by telephone to the victims

In the course of conducting an investigation to reveal the suspicion of fraud, or protecting deposits, inducing victims to withdraw deposits in cash and leave them to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and the Defendants (hereinafter referred to as the “definite role”) committed acts as if they were employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, and receive cash directly from the victims, and E (hereinafter referred to as the “Kamerm” role) shared the mutual role of receiving the said money from the Defendants, while monitoring the site, in order to receive the said money from the Defendants and forward it again to the trillion staff who play a role of money exchange or cash book designated by the Organization.

1. The Defendant A’s name indisorder assumes a false inspection conducted at the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office on February 9, 2017 with a phone call from the victim F around 09:00 on February 9, 2017, and “the name of the political party is stolen due to the fact that an account in the name of the political party is G’s case.

In order to verify whether the money deposited in the account in the name of the political party includes illegal funds and to prove that the money was damaged by the political party, it is necessary to additionally examine the money stored in another bank regardless of the error code, and to withdraw it.