소유권이전등기
1. The Defendant was dated September 30, 2016, from the Plaintiff, on September 30, 2016, 56.2/3,104 of each real estate listed in the separate sheet.
On August 26, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant on August 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiff entered KRW 17,00,000 in the purchase price of approximately 56.2 square meters, KRW 5,66,00,000,000,000,000 for the remainder 4,76660,000,000,000 for the contract, until September 1, 2015; however, the Plaintiff paid 2% (1,013,200,000) of the purchase price at the time of full payment of the remainder by September 1, 2015; the Defendant entered the sales contract with the Plaintiff as KRW 30,00,00 for the remainder 46,6480,00 at the discount of September 1, 2015; and the Plaintiff’s share in each of the said real estate in the list 15,2015,25.
According to this, the plaintiff is obligated to take over the registration procedure for transfer of ownership for each real estate of this case from the defendant, except in extenuating circumstances.
The Defendant’s argument concerning the Defendant’s assertion argues to the effect that the instant sales contract was invalidated because the Plaintiff’s employee D could impose money on the Plaintiff’s investment in each of the instant real estate without any on-site return, and entered into the instant sales contract at a low price, and on September 15, 2015, D demanded the Plaintiff to withdraw the contract on March 10, 2016, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be complied with.
According to the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the Defendant purchased each of the instant real estate on March 10, 2016 to the Plaintiff with the belief of only the Plaintiff’s employees’ horse.