1. Around May 10, 2005, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant would first lend money to the victim as it is short of money to establish the real town located in K at the time of the permanent residence of the North Korean territory,” and that “The Defendant would first lend money from the surety insurance to the victim’s residence of the victim J. 104, 1001.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to decide on the above real estate transport, and the money received from the victim was thought to be used as a personnel fee and rent of the real estate consulting company operated by the Defendant, so even if he borrowed the above money, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50 million won from the victim under the name of guarantee insurance premiums on the same day from the victim, and acquired it through deception from the victim from that time during the same year.

5. From 20.20 to 20.20, the victim received a total of KRW 92,80,000 from the victim on three occasions, as shown in the attached list 1 of the crimes committed in the above manner, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around June 20, 2005, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The victim made an investment in the complex of Ilsan, 80 billion won was invested in the complex of shopping districts, and her friendly relationship was 80 billion won, and even though her 20 billion won was invested, the Defendant would be able to recover the amount of money as much as it would be possible to recover.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have invested in the above Ilsan Complex, and even if he borrowed the above money, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

As such, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50 million won from the victim for the same day as the starting money from the victim and acquired it through deception from the victim from the same year.

8. By the end of 24, the above method is the same.