However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment called “C” located on the second floor of Gyeonggi-si B building.

Although anyone is prohibited from engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, the defendant employed D as female employees at the above sexual traffic business establishment around April 21, 2017, and arranged the act of arranging sexual traffic from October 2, 2016 to the above time by receiving KRW 130,00 in return for sexual traffic from male customers who had found the above business establishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as control site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account all the factors of sentencing, including the observation of protection and the fact that there is a record of being sentenced to a suspension of indictment and a fine for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the fact that the crime is divided, the scale of business, the age and health conditions of the accused,