However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant’s window at Changwon-si around September 27, 2014, around 06:10

C. At the “Dno-ju shop”, the victim F (the 44 years of age) who drinked as the Defendant’s ship to drink E and alcohol, had been in a dispute at the end of the plenary session, and the Defendant and the victim F (the 44 years of age) had been in the same way the victim’s head was calculated with an empty beer who was a dangerous article on the tables on the grounds that the Defendant and the above E fighting were fighting, and the victim strokeed the victim’s head, and strokeed the victim’s head with the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes No. 1, 2, and 6 to the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a point in which discretionary mitigation is conducted);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that it is a contingent crime under the influence of alcohol between the victim and the rear line in society, and the fact that the victim is unable to punish the defendant by mutual consent immediately after the crime is committed);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;