체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Circumstances and details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, who is a foreigner of the Republic of Korea of the Philippines, was born two children between the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea of Pakistan, and the said children have both the nationality of the Republic of Korea.
B. On November 10, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3-1) sojourn status and stayed in the Republic of Korea. On February 2, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for an extension of the sojourn period of other (G-1-9) sojourn status on the ground that the Defendant continued to stay in the Republic of Korea after obtaining permission on February 2, 2016, on March 24, 2016.
However, on July 13, 2016, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for extension on the ground that “No part of multiple actions against the legal order of the Republic of Korea cannot be recognized, the Plaintiff can move after childbirth, and the Plaintiff can bring up a child in its home country,” after confirming that B is in a state of legal confusion with C in the Republic of Korea and there is no intention of divorce.”
C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on January 24, 2017, and the Plaintiff returned to the Philippines on May 11, 2018.
On July 22, 2018, while entering the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3-1) sojourn status and staying together with his/her children, the Plaintiff obtained permission for extension of the period of stay from the Defendant on October 19, 2018 on the grounds of a dental treatment for his/her child, a person with parental authority, or a request for replacement of a custodian, and filed an application for alteration of the status of stay (hereinafter referred to as “application for alteration of this case”) with the Defendant on November 20, 2018. On November 19, 2018, the Plaintiff issued an application for alteration of the status of stay (F-1-1) to the Defendant on the same day on the ground that “no changes are made after an existing
(hereinafter “Disposition of Denial of Permission for Change.” Accordingly, the Plaintiff on November 20, 2018, which is the expiration date of the period of stay.