사기등
Of the facts stated in the judgment of the defendant 1, the crimes listed in [Attachment 1 to 5] No. 1 to 5 of the daily list of crimes and the judgment No. 2.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On August 20, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Jung-gu District Court on November 5, 201, and confirmed on November 5, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern District Court on January 11, 201.
[2013 Highest 2067] Since June 2006, the Defendant continued to perform his/her obligation in excess of KRW 300,000 to 400,000 to 400,000,000, and there was no winning in the rehabilitation, so even if he/she borrowed money or received goods from the victims, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount of the goods.
1. On September 19, 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim in “E” operated by the victim in Dongducheon-si D, 2008, stating, “A party shall have the right to receive the payment of the goods with the right to receive the payment of the goods later, whenever the right to receive the payment of the goods with the right to receive the payment of the goods with the right to receive the payment.”
The Defendant received from the victim the delivery of 25,223,00 won in total at 38 times during the period from July 8, 2012, as shown in the annexed Table 1.
Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.
2. Fraud against victim F;
A. On September 20, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “H” operated by the victim in Dongducheon-si G, 2009, stating that “I operates I in Dong Do Do Y, and, upon receiving money from the beneficiary of the contract, I supply rice, etc. necessary for the company’s company every time when it is demanded to settle the price of the goods.”
From September 29, 2012 to September 29, 2012, the Defendant received from the victim a total of 49,943,00 won of the market price over 61 times as shown in the annexed Table 2.
Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.
B. On September 12, 2009, the Defendant issued the contract to complete the registration of the transfer, due to the lack of “the victim” in “I” operated by the Defendant in the Dongducheon-siJ.