beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.30 2016가단8005

임금 등

Text

1. The defendant shall pay the following amount:

A. From February 9, 2015, Plaintiff A 39,489,532 and its amount are different.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. In addition to the overall purport of the pleadings in the statements No. 1-1 and No. 2-1 and No. 2, the Plaintiffs are as shown below [Attachment 1] B.

The fact that the defendant company retired while serving in the defendant company as described in paragraph (1), and the plaintiffs are the defendant.

(1) It may be recognized that the wages and retirement allowances described in paragraph (2) have not been paid.

No.

A. The plaintiff

(b) Service period;

(c) unpaid wages (cost).

(2) Wages in arrears (1) 4,50 (from October 1, 2013 to January 25, 2015) 4,586,032, 39,489,532, February 2, 2015, 10, 288, 208, 10, 288, 36, 639, 782, 393 (from March 2, 2013 to December 25, 2014; 10, 288, 36, 45, 205, 205, 208, 205, 36, 205, 205, 205, 205, 206, 34, 205, 205, 36, 205, 204, 305, 2014

B. The Defendant [Attachment 1] C to the Plaintiffs.

(3) The amount specified in paragraph (3) shall be D.

The obligation to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as provided in the Labor Standards Act from the date of counting to the date of full payment.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The Defendant asserted that the retirement allowance of Plaintiff C is not KRW 13,477,814 claimed by the said Plaintiff, but KRW 6,783,063. However, it is insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s assertion only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 8. There is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

B. The defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The plaintiffs' claims shall be accepted on the grounds of their reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

참조조문