beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.29 2017고단1789

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On July 22, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2.5 million due to a violation of road traffic laws in the Incheon District Court’s Vice-Support on July 22, 2008, and was charged with a summary order of KRW 2.5 million due to a violation of road traffic laws in the Incheon District Court’s Vice-Support on July 18, 2017, and is currently pending trial.

【Criminal facts】 On July 22, 2017, the Defendant driven Cwing-III Cargo Vehicles with approximately 0.053% alcohol content among blood while under the influence of alcohol from around 20km to around 147:0,000, from the day of influence 15:35 to the day of influence 147, the day of influence from the day of influence fluence fluence.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a statement on the circumstances of driving a drinking and inquiring about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (verification of suspect drinking records)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant who committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had been subject to punishment twice or more due to drinking driving; (b) the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself; (c) the Defendant’s alcohol concentration in blood is over 0.053%; and (d) the degree of alcohol content in blood is over 0.053%; and (c) the sentence like the order shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions specified in the instant argument.